Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Andrei Yahorau: Civil society needs a strategy to enter the EU-Belarus discussion
It would be foolish to insist on including the representatives of the civil society to the dialog, emphasizes the Chairman of the Coordinating Committee of the Belarusan National Platform.
On December 22, 2014 Minsk will host the conference of the Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum (BNP EaP CSF).
The conference will be dedicated to the problem of “Inventory and revaluation of the potential of the Eastern Partnership program for development of the Belarusan civil society”.
All national and regional NGOs, international structures, expert community, and media that are interested are invited to take part in the event.
On the threshold of the conference Andrei Yahorau, the Chairman of the Coordinating Committee of the Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum (BNP EaP CSF), shared the key problems for the BNP today with the EuroBelarus Information Service:
“Belarusan National Platform now should find its place and action strategy in the situation of renovated negotiations between Belarusan authorities and the European Union. The negotiations are going on, but Belarusan civil society doesn’t take part in it. I believe it should take its place there — if not today than in the perspective. Besides, it is very important for us that this dialog doesn’t become fully pragmatic, i.e. the issues of democracy, human rights, and common changes in Belarus shouldn’t disappear from the agenda. Monitoring the situation and preserving the process in this format should also become our goal in the negotiation process, so that all the above-mentioned problems don’t fall back into the shadow.”
Andrei Yahorau emphasizes that “it would be rather foolish to insist on including the representatives of the civil society to the dialog without announcing our action plans”:
“At the conference we should all concentrate on the strategy that will allow us enter and take part in the dialog without losing the values and goals defined by the Belarusan National Platform.
Besides, the conference will consider structural changes that follow from the decisions of the IV Civil Society Forum that took place on November 20-21, 2014 in Batumi. It is assumed that the reform of the organizational and administrative structure will allow optimizing and enhancing the efficiency of EaP CSF’s work. It is planned to form five panels of working groups on key directions (democracy issues, human rights, economy, etc.) with the national coordinator from each country of the Eastern Partnership.”
Others
-
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the “Union State” undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
-
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
-
Press release of the BNP in connection with the next round of the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
-
Hennadiy Maksak: Europe must react adequately to the events in Minsk
A new wave of political repressions should make the EU return to tougher policy towards the Belarusan regime.
Comments
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.