Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Has Europe turned blind eye to Lukashenko's human rights abuses in Belarus? (Video)
Brussels temporarily suspended package of sanctions despite lack of change in Minsk regime.
The EU temporarily eased sanctions on Belarus in late October 2015 after the Lukashenko regime released a group of political prisoners and the presidential elections were carried out without mass ‘repression'. But opposition activists argued these signs of goodwill were merely window dressing, in a country where the Belarus strongman's 21 year rule has been marred by accusations of human rights abuses.
More recently, Minsk has attempted to be perceived as the peacemaker between Putin's Russia and Ukraine over the conflict in Donbas. So why did the EU decide to change its policy towards Lukashenko? And what leverage or ability does it have to change the Belarusian political system?
Andrei Yahorau, the director of the Belarus-based think-tank Centre for European Transformation discusses this with Ukraine Today correspondent Tom Bell at the recent Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum in Kyiv, Ukraine:
“Nothing has changed in terms of the human rights situation. Violation of freedom of speech, assemblies and all the political rights in our country; fraud during the election process and so on... I think that the European Union knows this but now we have quite a different geopolitical situation in the context of the war, of military aggression of Russia against Ukraine.”
“[President Lukashenko's involvement in the Minsk peace process] was just a show. In reality, there is no independent position of Belarus from the position of Russia but it has performed a more-or-less neutral (position) without this idiotic propaganda in Belarusian media about this situation [in Ukraine] and this is appreciated by the European Union. The European Union wants to preserve Belarus (in) the sphere of its influence.”
“I don't believe in very fast changes [in Belarus]. I don't believe in our political opposition and political parties because [there is] a huge problem [with] unity among political forces, unity between the political forces and the civil society in Belarus so people do not really have a political alternative to [President] Lukashenko.”
Others
-
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the “Union State” undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
-
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
-
Press release of the BNP in connection with the next round of the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
-
Hennadiy Maksak: Europe must react adequately to the events in Minsk
A new wave of political repressions should make the EU return to tougher policy towards the Belarusan regime.
Comments
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.